Protectionists Speaking For Australians at Election Time

The National Chairman of the Australian Protectionist Party today announced , despite the Australian Electoral Commission putting a hold on the Party’s registration process until after the election, the Party would be standing some candidates for this Federal election.

“Members and supporters were understandably disappointed at the news the Party could not stand candidates for this election” Mr. Phillips said, “However, we recognize that this is a minor setback and the issues confronting Australians are still there and still need to be addressed”.

The Australian Protectionist Party will support Independent candidates in NSW for the Senate positioned in Group D and will also stand an Independent in the South Australian rural seat of Mayo.

“Protectionists standing as Independents will speak out on issues affecting our nation’s future, the same issues Australians from all walks of life have expressed concern about to us from the beginning” Mr. Phillips continued, “Australians recognize our continent is fragile and cannot adequately support many more people, they want Australian primary producers to be given a fair go in the face of unfair Free Trade Agreements and they want Australian politicians to start putting the welfare of our own people at the forefront of any decision making process.”

“The standing of independents at this election is the process of building a solid foundation and profile on which to mount a strong campaign for the Protectionist Party in 2013” Mr. Phillips concluded.

Statement issued by Mr. Andrew Phillips, Australian Protectionist Party

PO Box 1452 Mt Barker 5251

0403 699 086

www.protectionistsa.com

www.protectionist.net

www.protectionists.org

Comments

  1. masealake says:

    Why believe coalition committed to health reform without implementing the Preventive Health?

    It’s all about power and money most Politicians and parties wanted above all and after all election?

    Just listen how Barry O'Farrell convincing voters: “The key to our program is giving medical professionals a bigger say in how health services are delivered in their area. These are the people who know what their patients need…so we will be listening to them”.

    Take a look below the link subject: “Time for Action” in “Healthy Active Life” program that convert Broken hill into a Healthy Las Vergas Broken Hill economy? Link with http://www.streetcorner.com.au/news/showPost.cfm?…
    … .

    When we look at what Kevin Rudd’s labor government has expend John Howard’s coalition government endorsed Preventive Health program into “Healthy Active Life” program phase 1-2 before oust.

    Will you then still believe Mr Barry O'Farrell’s coalition opposition is committed to health reform (put some money in some hospital if you liked)? Then call it rebuild the hospital system through Better Hospitals and Healthcare program? A truly health reform that would fix all health problems?

    Will you also believe there were only 1-2 Politicians responding to this greatest “Healthy Las Vergas Broken Hill economy model”?

    Why the most Politicians do fail their own test in spend little brain work to come up some innovative idea that truly achieve the health reform materialized benefits to all voters?

    Masealake (Member of Inventor Association QLD)

  2. masealake says:

    Why believe coalition Supporting Local Communities?

    It’s all about power and money most Politicians and parties wanted above all and after all election?

    Just listen how Barry O'Farrell convincing voters: “Over the last four years I announced positive and practical policies which will help support local communities……..” .

    Take a look below the link subject: “Time for Action” in “Healthy Active Life” program that convert Broken hill into a Healthy Las Vergas Broken Hill economy? Link with http://www.streetcorner.com.au/news/show... , will you then still believe Barry O'Farrell’s announced positive and practical policies which will help support local communities……..” ?

    Will you also believe there were only 1-2 Politicians responding to this greatest “Healthy Las Vergas Broken Hill economy model”?

    Why the most Politicians do fail their own test in support community health/economic development who with$1.65 million Tax payer’s money each annual spending for?

    Masealake (Member of Inventor Association QLD)

  3. What democratic societies should learn lessen from Australia election 2010:

    1. What creative vision of Gillard Labor government’s nation-building agenda without support to Australian Inventors?

    The Australia historical hung parliament demonstrated the big gap in 70 years of inequality society between the small educated elite groups who get highest pay by talk feast used mouth work controlling live essential resources of the country in every social platforms against the biggest less educated groups who get lowest pay by hands work squeezed by discriminative policies that sucking live blood from individual poor/less wealth off?

    Voters’ voices do not hear?

    Voters’ pains do not ease?

    Voters’ cries do not care?

    1. Poverty will not be phase out if no fairer resources to share;

    2. Illness will not be reducing if no preventive measurement in real action;

    3. Agriculture will not be revitalize if urbanization continuing its path;

    4. Housing affordability will not be reach for young generation if government continues cashing from young generation debt by eating out the whole cake of education export revenue without plough back;

    5. Manufacture industry will shrink smaller and smaller if no new elements there to power up to survive;

    6. Employability will not in the sustainable mode for so long as manufacture and agriculture not going to boost.

    Ma kee wai

    (Member of Inventor Association Queensland since 1993)

  4. What democratic societies should learn a lessen from Australia election 2010:

    1. What time bombs will rock Australia democratic society?

    The Australia historical hung parliament demonstrated the big gap of inequality society between the small educated elite groups who get highest pay by talk feast used mouth work controlling live essential resources of the country in every social platforms against the biggest less educated groups who get lowest pay by hands work squeezed by discriminative policies that sucking live blood from poor/less wealth off?

    Voters’ voices do not hear?

    Voters’ pains do not ease?

    Voters’ cries do not care?

    1. Poverty will not be phase out if no fairer resources to share;

    2. Illness will not be reducing if no preventive measurement in real action;

    3. Agriculture will not be revitalize if urbanization continuing its path;

    4. Housing affordability will not be reach for young generation if government continues cashing from young generation debt by eating out the whole cake of education export revenue without plough back;

    5. Manufacture industry will shrink smaller and smaller if no new elements there to power up to survive;

    6. Employability will not in the sustainable mode for so long as manufacture and agriculture not going to boost.

    Ma kee wai

    (Member of Inventor Association Queensland since 1993)

  5. masealake says:

    What Australia hung parliament demonstrating deep in voter’s heart?

    Australia citizens now enter a very challenging political era for 70 years in the 2010 federal election, many reforms are demanding by voters are looking for a change with anger to share fairer resources supplied lives from the first term of government?

    Voters handed down their decisive votes during election time are looking for an efficient, effective and economically run government. A high transparency in less mistaken caused processing under no discriminately enforced services government. A long term wealth creative vision with fast action moving forward progressing resulting value add to voters benefits in each term of governing.

    Voters are crying for action right now to have improved resources support lives that suppose lead by a government in the following eight commitments:

    1. What vision of prosperity voters seen?

    2. Why action not enough in the past 3 years?

    3. How many election promises has been fulfilled?

    4. Where productivity motivation to voters?

    5. What materials to speed up election promises processing?

    6. Why some election promises in powerless process?

    7. How far transparency in each department service voters wanted?

    8. Where prioritized direction to empowerment the nation?

  6. masealake says:

    No matter who will win a government?

    Hung parliament result the fact people wanted fairer live resources supported

    “Health Olympic Australia” is a nationally and international significant movement in the 21 century “knowledge economy” in “Health Economy Gold Rush”:

    ● By pass all economy in human history that benefit to every habitant on earth;

    ● All habitant must to face either lost, or to win;

    ● The dead lock situation either lost health supply, or getting enough supply to win the battle of health demands in health rebuilding in her/his own right efforts to achieve wealth creation.

    There are at least five economic productivity outcomes will resulting significant GDP progressing from a “Health Olympic Australia” as follow:

    1. Reductions in Australian Health Workforce cost;

    2. Reduction in Healthcare cost;

    3. Reduction in lost productivity cost;

    4. Increase from agriculture outcome;

    5. Increase from “Health Olympic Australia” creation in goods/products exportation.

    Ma kee wai

    (Member of Inventor Association Queensland since 1993)

  7. klippies101 says:

    why when blacks rob a white its called crime? but when a white attacks a black tis called rascim ?

  8. masealake says:

    Who still be Prime Minister if he read a letter sent by an Australia Inventor last October

    That letter regarding “Shaping a Healthy and Wealthy Future for Australia “sent to The Prime Minister Kevin Rudd on 29 October 2009.

    My “Health Olympic Australia” project will not only assist the Australian Government to shape a better health system for Australians but will also improve the general health of Australians. This will put Australia in a strong position for long term wealth generation and prosperity.

    The “Health Olympic Australia” project is based on an experimental trial to prove the success results of “The China Study”.

    “The China Study” is a 2005 book by T. Colin Campbell, Ph.D., an outspoken vegan and his son, Thomas M. Campbell II. Dr. Campbell is a professor of Nutritional Biochemistry at Cornell University, and one of the directors of the China Project. The book examines the relationship between the consumption of animal products and illnesses such as cancers of the breast, prostate, and large bowel, diabetes, coronary heart disease, obesity, autoimmune disease, osteoporosis, degenerative brain disease, and macular degeneration.

    “The China Project” is referred “The China Study” outcome , a "survey of death rates for twelve different kinds of cancer in over 2,400 counties and 880 million (96%) of their citizens" conducted jointly by Cornell University, Oxford University, and the Chinese Academy of Preventive Medicine over the course of twenty years.

    The “China Study” Clinical Trial I conducted was based on a 95 year old lady, who participated in a two year health improvement trial from August 2007 to September 2009. The trial involved living in accordance with the principles of “The China Study” to determine whether the principles would result in improved health outcomes claimed by the authors of “The China Study”.

    The "China Study" Clinical Trial was scientifically successful by two meaningful demonstrations. The first of a chemistry blood test to all organs, it shows the results as good as the young people; and the second meaningful health improvement in physical capabilities.

    There are several numbers parts of health improvement and physical capabilities demonstrating as follow:

    • The 97 year old lady in question is now permanently free from her heart problem medication.

    • Her long term age cough gradually less and less, and finally stop a few months ago..

    • She did not ask to buy any more of pain relief paste for at least six months (she needs numbers time each month for her rheumatoid arthritis knees).

    • She is able to pick up small particle as small as a needle or a peace of rice from the mat in front of the kitchen (she only see our faces not clear two years ago).

    • She previously required the support of a walking stick to stand for some years, She is now able to stand up and walk comfortably for a significant distance (30 to 50 meters) without the aid of a walking stick.

    • She is now able to walk down the stairs (10 stairs per floor) from the 5th floor (40 steps in total) of a building without stopping and without heavy breathing. It was surprising to see that she had her walking stick under her left arm instead to use it to stand on the ground to support her body, and with her left hand she held a bag with her personal effects that about weighed 2kg.

    Finally on 28 September 2009 she was able to pull a 20kg wheeled bag over 30 metres to travel from Zhuhai port China (next to Macau) back to Hong Kong unassisted.

    “Health Olympic Australia” might provide Australia with the opportunity to win the Nobel Peace Prize as it will, with the cooperation of the Taiwanese government, result in democracy in China and the peaceful re-unification of China and Taiwan.

    This will be achieved by Australian grain powder instead of gun powder in response to the calls of the “WHO’s Third World Health Revolution” to provide equal opportunities for everyone to gain his/her health and wealth.

    “Health Olympic Australia” to win a Nobel Prize in Economics might also be Australia’s opportunity, if Australia was the first nation to pioneer the use of our grain powder to meet the WHO recommendation to consume 60% in healthy grain foods as a part of our daily intake to maintain good health. This will allow Australia to lead the world in the creation of health and wealth to benefit the citizens of the world.

    Prime Minister, the steps that will allow Australia to pioneer in achieves the worlds “Health Economy” is by Australia:

    • Inventing health improvement patterns;

    • Growing high antioxidant healthy grains and plants;

    • Manufacturing high antioxidant healthy grain powder products;

    • Exporting its health improvement knowledge and pattern; and

    • Exporting health improvement resources (including human resources).

    Now that Australia is being led by a progressive Labor government, let’s grasp this “Health Olympic Australia” opportunity to not only shape Australia’s health system, but to improve the health of Australians and the rest of the world. This in turn will allow us to further improve the long term wealth of Australia and the world.

    I have enclosed the “Health Olympic China Spring” DVD for your viewing and hope that you will be inspired by the “Health Olympic Australia” plan and provide support so that firstly we will be able to attend the APHA forum and to secondly provide support in our application for the Australian Research Council’s “The Future Fellowship”. This will allow Australia to pioneer “Health Olympic Australia” under your leadership and shape Australia’s agricultural, manufacturing, social and economic development. Australia will lead the world in the achievement of a newly discussing “Health Economy”.

    Prime Minister, this could also be Australia’s best opportunity to simultaneously win a Nobel peace prize and a Nobel Prize for Economics. I urge you to agree to allow this unprecedented project to happen under the leadership your Labor government.

    The highest regards

    Ma sealake

    (Member of the Queensland Inventor Association since 1993).

  9. Er, why are you guys preferencing the Liberal Democratic Party? That's what the Below The Line website says.

    But the LDP is pro-diversity and pro-open-borders:

    The LDP would expand opportunities to live and work in Australia while carefully guarding access to welfare and citizenship.

    The LDP supports immigration and believes immigrants generally provide a net social and economic benefit to Australia. It supports expanding opportunities to live and work in Australia while carefully guarding opportunities to receive welfare or become full citizens.

    The LDP also supports additional “free immigration agreements” with appropriate countries (Japan, Singapore, Canada, Sweden, etc) similar to the current agreement with New Zealand and along the same lines as “free trade agreements”

    The free movement of people, within and between countries, generally contributes to greater prosperity than when movement is restricted.

    Like the free movement of goods and capital, the free movement of people is not only a basic human right but also contributes to economic growth by allowing the benefits of greater trade in the labour market. This trade benefits both the new immigrant and their new nation. Immigrant nations such as America, Australia, New Zealand and Canada have benefited enormously from high levels of immigration.

    Please explain. I thought One Nation would be the natural first choice for your preferences.

  10. klippies101 says:

    http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/a/-/newshome/776

    29-year-old soldier serving in the Special Air Service Regiment has been killed in Afghanistan.

    Acting Defence Force chief Lieutenant General David Hurley named the soldier as Trooper Jason Brown, 29, a member of the Perth-based Special Air Service Regiment.

    Lt-Gen. Hurley said Trooper Brown was shot overnight while assisting in a "disruption operation" in northern Kandahar.

    Several insurgents engaged the coalition troops using small arms and Trooper Brown received multiple gunshot wounds.

    He received immediate first aid and was evacuated by helicopter to Kandahar but later died.

    Lt-Gen. Hurley expressed "deep regret" at Trooper Brown's death

  11. We have finally made it ! 🙂

  12. Sent to Q&A program 9.8.2010

    Question To PM GILLARD;

    What measures are you taking for ASSIMILATION of MUSLIMS INTO OUR DEMOCRACY to PREVENT ISLAMIFICATION and SHARIA LAWS in AUSTRALIA, and what are you doing about those people inciting rejection of AUSTRALIAN DEMOCRACY!?

    Emailed previously to the Prime Minister

    SUBJECT; “REAL LEADERSHIP”

    ATTENTION; JULIA GILLARD PM 4.8.2010

    Dear Julia,

    On behalf of the majority of Australian Voters, I petition you to show REAL LEADERSHIP and address a serious issue that so far has been in your “too hard basket”.

    People want to see your policy on “ASSIMILATION” as a real issue that neither party has so far addressed in this election campaign.

    We are sick of the empty slogans and repetitive mantras for dummies. Treat us with respect and show leadership with honest answers to the following that we want to see in this election campaign now!…………….

    Why is it that our diggers in Afghanistan and Iraq (Muslim countries), sacrifice their lives to give those people the freedoms and liberties of a democracy (that is incompatible with Sharia Law), whilst those refugees who we take in, do not ASSIMILATE and accept our culture – Rule of Law per a Western Democracy?!

    I urge you to legislate to ban Sharia Law and associated groups in our country. That means to also ban the Burqa and hijab dress code of Islamists who seek to divide our nation with their oppressive Sharia Law agenda.

    I refer to

    1/. A Perth judge is set to decide this week whether a Muslim woman can wear a full burqa while giving evidence before a jury in a fraud case. WA District Court Judge Shauna Deane is due to hear submissions on Thursday from lawyers for the prosecution and defence regarding the witness who wishes to wear the burqa, also called a niqab. The woman is a strict Muslim who does not want to show her face to men. Defence lawyers have raised concerns about how the jury is expected to read the woman's facial expressions if they cannot see her face. (Refer nine msn national news 3.8.2010)

    2/. Page 2 THE AUSTRALIAN Newspaper July 31 Sally Neighbour “AL-QA’IDA LINK TO AUSTRALIA-BASED NET CONFERENCE” “Islamists spread Terror Message”

    Why doesn’t ASIO arrest – prosecute – deport, these ISLAMIC activists who seek to promote terrorism? What are our troops fighting for overseas when we allow this garbage on our own soil?!

    3/. REF Sally Neighbour 5th July 2010 Source: The Daily Telegraph

    Muslims told to shun democracy TUESDAY, 06 JULY 2010 00:12

    Islamist leader Burhan Hanif tells Aussie Muslims to 'shun democracy'

    LEADERS of the global Islamist group Hizb ut-Tahrir have called on Australian Muslims to spurn secular democracy and Western notions of moderate Islam and join the struggle for a transnational Islamic state.

    British Hizb ut-Tahrir leader Burhan Hanif told participants at a conference in western Sydney yesterday that democracy is "haram" (forbidden) for Muslims, whose political engagement should be be based purely on Islamic law. "We must adhere to Islam and Islam alone," Mr Hanif told about 500 participants attending the convention in Lidcombe.

    "We should not be conned or succumb to the disingenuous and flawed narrative that the only way to engage politically is through the secular democratic process. It is prohibited and haram."

    He said democracy was incompatible with Islam because the Koran insisted Allah was the sole lawmaker, and Muslim political involvement could not be based on "secular and erroneous concepts such as democracy and freedom".

    His view was echoed by an Australian HT official, Wassim Dourehi, who told the conference Muslims should not support "any kafir (non-believer) political party", because humans have no right to make laws.

    Mr Dourehi also urged Muslims to spurn the concept of moderate Islam promoted by governments in the West, including in "this godforsaken country" of Australia.

    "We need to reject this new secular version of Islam," he said. "It is a perverted concoction of Western governments.

    "It is a perversion that seeks to wipe away the political aspects of Islam and localise our concerns. We must reject it and challenge the proponents of this aberration of Islam."

    The conference, which followed the theme The struggle for Islam in the West' was the first major event held by the Australian branch of HT since a seminar in 2007 which coincided with calls for the group to be banned.

    HT is outlawed in much of the Middle East but operates legally in more than 40 countries, campaigning for the establishment of a caliphate or Islamic state.

    HT's platform rejects the use of violence in its quest for an Islamic state, but supports the military destruction of Israel.

    Nick Folkes, the Sydney organiser for the APP, believes that the HT should be banned in Australia and thinks that practising sharia law should be illegal in Australia.

    "Sharia law is an archaic legal system that treats woman as second-class citizens," he said.

    "We're not asking them to change their skin colour or religion. But if they come here, they must reject sharia law."

    PLEASE REPLY AND DEAL WITH THIS IMPORTANT ISSUE ON TELEVISION NOW.

    VIC

  13. klippies101 says:

    seems to me like the liberal government is agaisnt low wage workers paid parental leave i dont think i will vote for them

    who does the app give there vote to

  14. klippies101 says:

    http://www.news.com.au/national/toy-guns-will-hav

    how many more of our rights must we lose?

  15. I do not understand how the AEC can put a hold on the APP's registration. Who really runs this country? Does the government in place have the control of the AEC? Surely if all criteria and times are met there should be no hold-up.

  16. klippies101 says:

    why did they do this ?

    The National Chairman of the Australian Protectionist Party today announced , despite the Australian Electoral Commission putting a hold on the Party’s registration process until after the election, the Party would be standing some candidates for this Federal election.

  17. The party has come a long way in the past few years, this election and the subsequent years to follow will show that teh APP can only go from dtrength to strength.

    Good on ya mates!

  18. OzPatriot says:

    Good on the Australian Protectionist Party.

    Andrew Phillips is a decent and brave individual who has Australians and Australian industry at the forefront of his priority list.

    It is important that we foster and encourage the Australian identity and the APP will do this without the fear of PC and reprisals from the left.

    I wish them all the luck in the world as they will be fighting the good and just fight!

Leave a Reply