SBS Insight – “I’m surrounded by mad lefties”

A report from Nick Folkes

I was surrounded by mad lefties and multiculturalists when I appeared on the SBS Insight episode titled, “I’m Not Racist, But” which screened nationally on Australian television on Tuesday, 20th March 2012.

The programme typifies the regressive environment we live in today. The host and panelists were multiculturalism apologists, eager to portray Australia as a ‘redneck’ racist nation, one that is not worthy of preserving its racial and cultural identity. The cultural and racial critique was in one direction – directed towards vilifying white Australians.

To make matters worse, the audience was stacked with the usual left-wing trendies and multiculturalists, all eager to ridicule anyone who spoke out in defence of Australia and white Australians in particular. It was obvious that the audience was stacked with what could be called ‘useful idiots’, people keen to proudly display themselves as ‘multicultural warriors’ but who are actually out to publicly crucify bearers of the truth.

I sat in the audience surrounded by a bunch of chardonnay-sipping socialists and rabid multiculturalists. Sitting on my left was Professor Jakubowitz, a sociologist from the eastern suburbs, and on my right sat Toby Ralph, a public relations and marketing executive. During the recording of the episode I brought up the issue of Muslim rape of Australian women and Jakubowitz responded by arrogantly downplaying Muslim rape cases. In his apologetic manner he quoted some obscure study stating the North Coast of NSW had higher rape statistics than the Muslim-dominated suburbs of Sydney. If this was true, it obviously means that the Muslim rape gangs were carrying out their dastardly attacks in Aussie suburbs rather than in their own. For racist Muslim rape gangs which target Australian girls, like that led by Bilal Skaf, it would ‘make sense’ to their twisted minds to use such a tactic; it is the rapists’ version of “don’t mess where you sleep”. I’m always amazed by multiculturalist social engineers who are more interested in conveying excuses to the public rather than dealing with the true situation.

The real victims of crime in dysfunctional multicultural Australia are white people, and the crime statistics prove my point. The not so special broadcasting service has a history of biased reporting and commentary, so naturally our short discussion on Muslim rape in Australia was not included in the final cut.

Jenny Brockie spoke about racism on Australian television and asked the audience to view a commercial, which was banned last year by the politically correct Advertising Standards Bureau. The unenlightened in the audience thought the ad was ‘racist’ merely for portraying an Indian as a door-to door salesman for an electricity provider. Toby Ralph spoke about the commercial, saying “it was banned because it’s racist; it underlined negative stereotypes about Indians”. He then descended into the gutter by vilifying the white girl in the advert as a “pert little Caucasian blonde, who was like, you know, a sexualized Hitler Youth” – I was knocked over by his blatant ignorant double standards. Here is this idiot making a complaint about a so-called ‘racist’ commercial, which wasn’t even racist; then in poor taste Ralph racistly attacked the young white girl. Would he have called her “Hitler Youth” if she was an Aboriginal actress? His racist bigotry was astounding. The hypocrisy and stupidity of the multiculturalists was once again on display.

The highlight of the evening was ‘Nathan’. This character requested anonymity because he claimed that he has received several death threats. It has been alleged that ‘Nathan’ is actually Alex Gollan, the shadowy figure behind the trashy ‘The Anti-Bogan’ website, who describes himself as an ‘anti-racism’ campaigner, although it is common knowledge that the phrase ‘anti-racism campaigner’ essentially means ‘anti-white campaigner’ in real terms.

The so-called ‘Anti-Bogan’ people are basically a bunch of cyber bullies who spend their time cruising social networking sites like Facebook looking for any comments that “offend” them. This includes any comments deemed ‘racist’, ‘homophobic’ or viewed as otherwise ‘inappropriate’ by authoritarian multiculturalists. Even though these Facebook comments are personal correspondence between individuals, often they are publicly viewable, and the ‘Anti-Bogan’ site takes great delight in republishing such personal correspondence and targeting any individuals who do not meet their standards of Political Correctness, in what can only be described as a form of cyber bullying. This bullying has been actively added to by the use of intimidation tactics against targeted individuals; whether people directly associated with the ‘Anti-Bogan’ site are involved is a matter that will need to be looked into. However, what is known is that various unsavoury elements, shadowy types and criminals have joined in with these ‘Anti-Bogan’ campaigns against individuals, often by contacting their employers in hopes of getting people sacked, as well as attempting to intimidate their victims with threats of physical violence.

The actions of people like Alex Gollan, Jenny Brockie and the panelists prove that the multiculturalists are only interested in giving a one-sided view of racism in Australia. According to such bigoted arguments, racism only affects non-white people.

The reality of racism, discrimination and bigotry, in Australia and elsewhere, paints an entirely different picture – white people are increasingly the victims of racism and are over-represented in criminal statistics as victims of ethnic crime perpetrated by Africans, Muslims, Islanders and Asians. Our women are raped, our men bashed and our children intimidated by culturally incompatible people, yet the social engineers and supporters of multiculturalism choose to deny the facts.

For the multiculturalists to make an impact on any selected topic they need to control and frame the argument, stack the audience and deny patriotic people an opportunity to argue against the multiculturalists’ weak arguments. The public will rarely, if ever, hear radical socialists chastise or judge the failures of multiculturalism or racist and anti-social behaviour perpetrated by incompatible ethno-cultures and people.

The SBS Insight episode was an example of deceptive and treasonous villains working against the Australian people. It is time for the Australian people to make a stand and fight the evil multiculturalists. The racist multiculturalists seek nothing less than the destruction of our nation. The episode was littered with bigoted, racist and anti-Australian sentiment.

I encourage you to watch the episode or read the transcript to make your own judgment. You won’t be surprised at the level of vilification directed towards white Australians.

Further reading:
“I’m Not Racist, But”, SBS Insight, 20 March 2012


  1. During the recording of the episode I brought up the issue of Muslim rape of Australian women and Jakubowitz responded by arrogantly downplaying Muslim rape cases. In his apologetic manner he quoted some obscure study stating the North Coast of NSW had higher rape statistics than the Muslim-dominated suburbs of Sydney. If this was true, it obviously means that the Muslim rape gangs were carrying out their dastardly attacks in Aussie suburbs rather than in their own. – what makes you think that?

  2. Theantibogan website’s sole existance is to harrass and bully people. These are very interesting comments about “Nathan”, I came across ‘theantibogan’ website some time ago but didn’t really pay much attention. Recently, I saw a post on facebook regarding theantibogan launching a smear against some guy who had “threatened to kill” some woman. This got my attention and I read further.

    As it turned out, the guy had not threatened to kill the woman at all. He had made a post where he said he would like to find this woman and “ram her words down her throat”. The words that she had directed towards this man was that as he was a racist, he was also probably..” a wife-beater and child rapist”! The man’s response may have been a bit over the top, but he had been very clearly provoked.

    I made a post on the antibogan and pointed it out, that the guy hadn’t actually threatened to kill anyone and that there had been extreme provocation by the woman. I also pointed out that by contacting his employer that THEY were the ones engaged in bullying, harrassment and generally ‘bogan’ behaviour.

    This started a cascade of on-line abuse from various antibogan posters (although some were fairly reasonable in their comments). One of the site moderators who calls themself “mindmadeup” and another called JM made some ludicrous personal comments about me including:

    That I am homophobic
    That I support violence against women,
    That I am a racist,
    That I behaved in a way suggesting any other lack of integrity or honesty and
    That I discharge my professional duties inadequately.

    Mindmadeup then published my full name, email adress and location to the thread!

    Whilst I remained annonymous, I could not care less what they had said about me. However, to impugn my character AND THEN identify me in a public forum is a clear attempt to harrass and bully. This is their Modus Operandi!

    I contacted the antibogan and informed them that I wanted a full retraction of the malicious imputations that had been leveled against me. It took about 5 emails and the threat of legal action before they would act.

    Their response was pretty smarmy. They removed the posted which contained my personal details (my email adress contains my full name) and all of the comments which mindmadeup had posted. They made an apology for posting my details, but none for sluring my name. They also refused to retract these baseless imputations. Instead that wrote to me:

    “I have given you what you have asked for – a retraction (deletion of offending comment) and an apology (which by memory I cannot actually recall you asking for). Your request (for a retraction) did not come with specific guidelines as to how bold or large the font should be, whether or not it should belong to its own post, highlighted on the homepage surrounded by quirky gif animations or anything of the like”.

    Clearly these people are adolesants. Although many may agree with their agenda, I wonder how many actually agree with their methods. The antibogan is clearly intollerant of any criticism, no matter how valid. The site is socially dangerous and their approach is unacceptable.

  3. RightWingEye says

    Attack from far Left again new Show called dumb drunk racist they are calling white australia it only

    fu… insult to aussie this show one sided pls sue show

    From RightWingEye

  4. nick, how did it feel to be seated behind 2 Muslims?

  5. Soothsayer says

    The whole concept of racism has morphed into something completely different. Once upon a time we combated racism to protect people and allow them to live unmolested and with equal opportunities.

    Equal opportunities meant that it was illegal not to hire the best applicant for a job simply because you didn't like their race, heritage, religion etc., . Now equal opportunity means affirmative action (apartheid) polices where applicants who are not the best candidates but will be slotted in so 'quotas' are filled or selected instead of a white candidate and organisations have the right 'diversity'.

    Combating racism used to mean that ALL people could live peacefully without being harassed while going about their daily business and live in safety. Now it means any discussion of the negative aspects of an ethnic group or criticism of a 'religion' is now racism.

    Being anti-racist now means that you self-censor yourself so nothing you say can be construed as 'racism'. We now seem to think it is progress that whites (especially the Anglos) get racially assaulted.

    Anti-racist now means double-standards (it also means anti-white). Being anti-racist used to be something to be proud of. Now I baulk at it because it is being used as a tool by the unscrupulous, the radical, the fanatical and the self-serving.

  6. The River Styx says

    I saw this program too and as usual the moderator was cutting people off at the crucial point of their argument. I don't find this program very Insightful any more. It seems to pander to the Multicultural adherents and as a free society, we don't all have to like it. One thing I would like to put here is not related to this program but, I found it so interesting I hope you will indulge me as it is a by-product of Multiculturalism. And thank you:


    Here are the differences between Kosher vs. Halal:

    Kosher – requires the animal be slaughtered quickly and humanely, strictly forbidding cruel slow methods like strangulation.

    Halal – requires the animal be bled out in agony while sick people who get off watching that kind of thing have a “festival.”

    Kosher – requires the blood be drained cleanly from the *carcass* of the humanely killed animal, removing toxins released from cells into the bloodstream at the moment of death from the meat.

    Halal – leaves the meat *filled* with toxins released at the moment of death because the blood is removed while the animal is dying and therefore is not present in sufficient quantities to remove those last toxins.

    Kosher – contains little to no cortisol or norepenepherine (two stress chemicals that are similar enough from mammal to mammal to cross species) because the animal to be killed is treated well before it is put down and is generally not frightened as it is put down (because in a truly kosher slaughter situation, animals cannot be slaughtered in a sequential fashion, as the waste of one could contaminate the next, so they are not exposed to the “scent of death” the way non-kosher culls are)

    Halal – animals watch other animals die during the blood letting festival, smelling their fear and raising their own stress. These stress chemicals “marinate” the meat in hormones known to raise levels of aggression and violence in nearly all mammal species (including human).

    Kosher – requires cooking the cleanly drained meat completely, cooking any remaining stress chemicals into oblivion.

    Halal – allows for a surprising range of cooking methods, including even some “tar tar” dishes (raw or nearly raw), allowing for the spread of disease and chemicals and hormones that were not removed by the idiotic slow bloodletting practice and half-measure cooking.

    Kosher: the spinal cord is sectioned thus cutting off pain to the brain. Therefore, no suffering or terror.

    Halal: spinal cord left intact.

    I feel it was my duty to pass on these differences to you in good faith and to warn you about some of the illnesses that may come your way. It is quite serious.

  7. Well done, Nick.

    Thank you for your courage. As a migrant to this country, I completely support you in your effort against multiculti PC activists.

    Multiculturalists are supremacist and racist – not protectionists. I have never experienced any racist behaviour towards myself in Australia. Never.But everytime ABC types talk about multiculturalism, I feel belittled and offended.

    • Nick Folkes, APP Syd says


      Thank you for your kind words. The people of Australia do not have a voice against the multiculti-racists. Both major parties foolishly support the genocide of our unique Australian culture and people which is derived from our European beginnings. Inferior third world cultures are given equal footing even though they have nothing positive to offer.

      In time I believe the APP will become a political force due to its protectionist philosphy and belief in putting 'the national interest' first.

  8. I think everyone should watch Red Dog, a great Aussie movie and maybe the penny may drop that WE are not racist, but that life style that was so unique will be /has been already eroded away.This next generation doesn't quite understand or do those pushing for people to come here.

  9. Well done Nick. Thank you for having the courage to face the enemies of Australia head on.

    It is typical of these enemies (being the loony left, the appeasers, and the idiots) to use numbers against anyone who wants to stand up for our culture here in the NATION of Australia. Soon we will be a minority, and we will pay for our apathy in seeing our children suffer.

    The sad reality of programs like the one that you attended is that they are aimed at the destruction of western culture, and that the majority of Australian’s either don’t care or are scared to speak up.

    Anyway thank you Nick. Don’t ever stop.

  10. Nick I was puzzled why you appeared on the program. It was all so predictable. You surely would have anticipated the makeup of the audience – that it would be a cheer squad for multiculturalism! I expected as much but was pleasantly surprised with the frankness of the Chinese Australian women interviewed about their own feelings towards other Asians.

    • Nick Folkes, APP Syd says


      I wouldn't let an opportunity like this pass. Even though the environment was predictable and I did anticipate the opposition would be hostile, it still gave me an opportunity to offer a voice of reason on the topic of racism.

      The main stream media and public broadcasters aren't interested in representing unbiased or balanced coverage but we still need to engage with the media in good times or bad.

Leave a Reply