The banning of political groups by the Uniparty is a stab in the heart of Australian democracy

The Labor-Liberal Uniparty has banned the political operations of the National Socialists in Australia; it is understandable that they have, because the fascist ideology is one which is opposed to the concept of Australian democracy. However, the ideal of Australian democracy is one that allows political participation to all shades of political opinion, no matter if people are far-right, far-left, or anywhere inbetween — that freedom of political expression is a corner-stone of our democracy.

Therefore, the Labor-Liberal Uniparty has betrayed the very foundations of the Australian democratic tradition.

It is worthwhile pointing out that the modern Labor and Liberal parties both follow the American-derived concept of Multiculturalism, and that the political ideology of Multiculturalism is, by its very nature, an authoritarian ideology.

Multiculturalism and large scale foreign immigration inevitably leads to community disunity and social upheaval, because invariably there will be those amongst the host population who object to having their country destroyed culturally and demographically (as they are, in effect, suffering from an immigration-driven genocide) – and, therefore, the political Multiculturalists will always turn to authoritarianism, or to fascistic methods, to destroy their political opponents who oppose the genocidal ideology of Multiculturalism. The development of authoritarianism and a police state is the only sure way to prop up a racially-divided Multicultural society.

Some in the Uniparty claim that their anti-democracy action of banning a political movement is needed because the rise of National Socialism will upset their traditional enemies or victims, such as Jews and Gypsies (and those of Jewish or Gypsy descent).

However, we know that is only an excuse, as the Uniparty has not banned the Communists, even though their existence will upset their traditional enemies or victims, such as Eastern Europeans and Cambodians (there are large numbers of these people living in Australia).

The National Socialists are alleged to have killed approximately 6 million civilians; the Communists are alleged to have killed approximately 100 million civilians — the brutal excesses of Pol Pot, Chairman Mao, and Stalin far outweigh those of Hitler, Mussolini, and Franco. So why is only one side banned, and not the other?

The fact that the Uniparty has not banned political extremists from both the far-left and the far-right tells us that there is a politically-motivated bias at work here.

There are three reasons why the National Socialists have been banned in Australia:

1) The National Socialists are vocal opponents against the Uniparty’s commitment to Multiculturalism and the Great Replacement.

2) The existence of the National Socialists upsets the sensibilities of the Uniparty’s Multiculturalist and Jewish supporters (both of which have powerful lobbying groups in Australia).

3) The Labor Party has historically contained within its ranks many Communists, neo-Communists, and closet Communists (and Communists are usually enemies of National Socialists) — and, to this day, the Labor Party includes people who are Communist-adjacent, if not worse.

The banning of the National Socialists in Australia is a form of political corruption, whereby apparatchiks of the Labor-Liberal Uniparty have banned their political opponents.

If Australia is to have a robust democracy, then no political group should be banned — let them all rise and fall in the cut and thrust of Australian politics. That is what democracy is all about.

The Uniparty’s banning of the National Socialists is not only illegal under Australia’s Constitution (with its implied right of free speech), but it shows us once and for all that the Labor and Liberal parties hate democracy and freedom of speech, and therefore they can never be trusted to rule Australia.