Partly. Getting out of the religion is a good start. The rest of it is a little sarcastically snide. My wife is Asian and brown.
I do not care if a man is green.
just by saying that I can assume you have a bias towards anybody who is not white

In the mean time, have a look at these Myths and Facts

So you swore at him.

Which begs the question…if you can’t accept a polite Muslim, who repeatedly states his agreement with many APP talking points what exactly does a Muslim have to do to be accepted by you? Save your life? Give you lot’s of money? Deny his religion, and suddenly become white?

While we’re at it:
“By admitting you are and staying islamic you aid and abet condoning your fellow terrorists actions as you must.”

So by belonging to a belief system, who has members that support terrorism, that person is held responsible for condoning and aiding terrorism, correct?

[***Edit, text deleted: Personal attacks, especially those using falsehoods, are subject to deletion; same as applies to texts that include trolling, rudeness or spam.]

I look forward to hearing your response!

Where did you get that number from?

thanks for your response. No, certainly no personal attack against you or Muslims – the points that I make are well documented. I’m generally of the view that religions pretty much need to be revised such that the overriding message is on sensible behaviour and accountability.

just to clarify, I didn’t presume this “Muslims getting offended at Australians celebrating Christmas?” Presumably some are – but I don’t know of any.
I was more saying that government policy has been introduced for fear of offending Muslims even if there is no basis and it’s prejudiced against non-Muslims – this type of culturally divisive policy is dangerous and is actually insulting to any thinking Muslims.

I didn’t imagine you would be getting anyone to leave – that was what we call tongue n’ cheek.

The critical thing as far as Australia is concerned at the moment is the numbers. Current levels of immigration are decimating our habitats, wildlife, standard of living and sending Australia bankrupt. There are many claims that this level of immigration benefits the people here, but these claims are serving a pro-growth agenda which essentially socialises the costs whilst privatising the profits. A balanced migration program that seeks to have emigration equivalent to immigration (including refugee intake) is in all of our interests – in fact, it would be sensible to cut Australia’s immigration to little more than 30,000 for several years as this would ease a lot of stress on our infrastructure and allow us to start making some headway on many other issues. This would also means we are more able to accommodate humanitarian needs. A point worth noting that’s often overlooked is that high immigration brings in a lot of consumers which increases our demand for foreign imports – this of course means we are having to sell more (usually of our mineral wealth) to service this growing debt – and this isn’t even starting on the growing costs of trying to maintain services to an increasing population. Estimates range between 250k – 500k per migrant in infrastructure costs and the reality is we are falling increasing behind in this respect.

The cultural aspect is important for reasons stated earlier. In India for instance, there’s an ongoing battle between the Muslims, Hindus and Christians as to who can outbreed each other. An insane agenda for a country that is increasingly struggling to meet India’s food production needs. We certainly don’t want to import this kind of mentality as we are struggling with our current population size.

Recently I read of a Muslim group which has decided to boycott elections in Australia. Unfortunately, this kind of thinking is counter-productive and certainly won’t achieve anything sufficiently quickly enough to curb potential problems. Increasingly, Australians are realising that it makes no difference whether Liberal or Labour are in power – they serve the same masters. What we need instead is to vote them out of office in favour of groups who seek to reduce immigration to more sensible levels.

well, it is a credit to you that you are looking at this. It is only through understanding that we can move forward.

And if you really want to understand these things more in depth – have a look at Overloading Australia by Mark O’Connor and William Lines. It is right up there with any of most important books written.